SULINGITUK GOVERNMENT: Weighting

Fictional Case Study

While analyzing the census results, a situation arises where the youth population significantly outperformed other age groups in terms of census participation. This has implications for data analysis, policy formulation, and community engagement. The overrepresentation of youth is linked to their active use of social media, where census-related posts garnered attention and motivated many young residents to participate. This now affects indicators related to education, employment, and substance use, because results are skewed due to their high participation. 

Accordingly, the Sulingituk Government has to deliberate between a report that genuinely reflects the voices of those who participated and one that accurately represents the entire population, including those who did not participate. In other words, does the Sulingituk Government want to reflect the voices of participants specifically, or to ensure a comprehensive portrayal of the entire membership? 

The Sulingituk Government goes back to the core purpose of their census – to obtain data to inform planning, decision-making, and budgeting. From this perspective, they recognize that a representative report would provide a more wholistic and representative understanding crucial for effective planning, policy formulation, and resource allocation.

To achieve this, they decide to implement a weighting strategy. This involves assigning different weights to the responses from various age groups to account for the overrepresentation of youth. This approach helps ensure that the report represents the voices and needs of all age groups and is, from their perspective, a fair and inclusive approach to take in actioning the findings. 

To read the entire Sulingituk Government case study, click here.

Back to the Case Studies